PLEASE NOTE: You may run across some dead links, temporarily. I am currently heavily revamping the site (as you can see), and am aware of the situation.

Please do not send me dead links until you see this message disappear. Thanks!

Monday, January 16, 2006

Parable of the Madman.

Have you not heard of that madman who lit a lantern in the bright morning hours, ran to the market place, and cried incessantly: "I seek God! I seek God!"---As many of those who did not believe in God were standing around just then, he provoked much laughter. Has he got lost? asked one. Did he lose his way like a child? asked another. Or is he hiding? Is he afraid of us? Has he gone on a voyage? emigrated?---Thus they yelled and laughed

The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his eyes. "Whither is God?" he cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him---you and I. All of us are his murderers. But how did we do this? How could we drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What were we doing when we unchained this earth from its sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving? Away from all suns? Are we not plunging continually? Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions? Is there still any up or down? Are we not straying, as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of empty space? Has it not become colder? Is not night continually closing in on us? Do we not need to light lanterns in the morning? Do we hear nothing as yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are burying God? Do we smell nothing as yet of the divine decomposition? Gods, too, decompose. God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.

"How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it? There has never been a greater deed; and whoever is born after us---for the sake of this deed he will belong to a higher history than all history hitherto."

Here the madman fell silent and looked again at his listeners; and they, too, were silent and stared at him in astonishment. At last he threw his lantern on the ground, and it broke into pieces and went out. "I have come too early," he said then; "my time is not yet. This tremendous event is still on its way, still wandering; it has not yet reached the ears of men. Lightning and thunder require time; the light of the stars requires time; deeds, though done, still require time to be seen and heard. This deed is still more distant from them than most distant stars---and yet they have done it themselves.

It has been related further that on the same day the madman forced his way into several churches and there struck up his requiem aeternam deo. Led out and called to account, he is said always to have replied nothing but: "What after all are these churches now if they are not the tombs and sepulchers of God?"
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science (1882, 1887) para. 125; Walter Kaufmann ed. (New York: Vintage, 1974), pp.181-82.

13 Comments:

Anonymous David Downey said...

Truly, I like the 'ugliest man' bit better (Thus Spake...), but that excerpt was the more poetic of the two.

10:24 PM  
Blogger just another anonymous kook said...

"Parable of the Madman" was the first excerpt I read by Nietzsche. I really need to read "Thus Spake Zarathustra" again...

10:32 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

I wish I could find a better response parable than this, but I don't have all my sources with me at the moment... However, here's a twist of thinking on Nietzsche's madmen which you have posted in the blog... Suppose the madman is a Kierkegaard's clown?
----------------------------------
The Happy Conflagration

What happens to those who try to warn the present age?


It happened that a fire broke out backstage in a theater. The clown came out to inform the public. They thought it was just a jest and applauded. He repeated his warning, they shouted even louder. So I think the world will come to an end amid general applause from all the wits, who believe it is a joke.

Either/Or – Soren Kierkegaaard

10:45 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

I mean, suppose instead of the madman, the speaker is Kierkegaard's clown proclaimin an end of some sort...

10:46 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

...proclaiming an end of some sort. [geez, I can't type or edit tonight]

10:47 PM  
Blogger just another anonymous kook said...

That's an interesting perspective... While Nietzsche's Madman is crying out to a world not ready to listen, Kierkegaard's clown is warning an audience who is not prepared for the news. Both are commentaries on the general public. Nietzsche's is a bit ambiguous: we're not really sure what the aim of the Madman is. Sure, if we research other works by Nietzsche, we'll find that his ultimate aim was to destroy the foundations of Christianity and create a new philosophy. However, from this text alone, I feel it's quite vague. Kierkegaard's parable seems to have a much clearer meaning. It's actually darker, in that it rests on the notion that humanity cannot, and will not, be prepared for the inevitable. It suggests that we are but feeble, naive creatures who concern ourselves with frivolous, worldly things and not focus on the 'greatest things.'

11:21 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

I mean, suppose instead of the madman, the speaker is Kierkegaard's clown proclaiming an end of some sort... In this light, does not the madman become more of the comically philosophic clown of sorts… the silly speaker? Is not the interpretation of the madman’s observation of man’s un-godliness (the death of god and crisis of faith) somewhat clown-like, hyperbolic, and delusional in light that he references the fantastical (alludes to God as a valid topic)? In the former argument concerning the madman, Nietzsche alludes to man’s traditional delusional past for having a belief in God (in the first place), and now that faith is collapsing. However, In Kierkegaards assumptions, God’s un-ending reality IS fact. So, if God (or the Hellenic/Christian deities) were never real actualities… as Nietzsche proposes (in several of his writings), would it be not be more ludicrous to have ever given GOD any credit or recognition in the first place – Like the madman rants on about? Will the real clown stand up?

11:28 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

Ah, I didn't realize you posted that last bit...

11:30 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

I just don't understand Nietzsche's attempt at such an elaborate funeral oration for something he doesn't believe exists in the first place... save the death of deistic sham? He seems to have a sorted of twisted guilt/sentimentality mix he can't quite wrestle down.

11:42 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

But I love Nietzsche's efforts, and there's no better example of trying to pave your own philosophical path than his... or so it seems sometimes.

11:45 PM  
Blogger just another anonymous kook said...

...But isn't all atheism a bit silly from its very core? Not believing in god is all well and good, but founding an entire philosophy based on the tenet that "god doesn't exist" is a bit absurd.

Take Sartre's Existentialism, for example. His entire existentialist outlook on life rests on the premise that god doesn't exist. If god does in fact exist, his entire worldview is rendered useless.

I suppose Nietzsche was concerned about the detriment religion caused the world. And his amplified sentiment, mocked the religious outlook on the world.

Why there aren't more adragonists shouting about non-existent dragons is beyond me.

11:47 PM  
Anonymous David Downey said...

Especially with the "Lord of the Rings" craze these past few years... I have yet to meet an ADRAGONIST myself...

12:40 AM  
Blogger just another anonymous kook said...

What, I didn't tell you? I'm a total adragonist, man. In my free time I slay dragons that I don't believe in. I even founded the first Positive Adragonist Movement (P.A.M.): adragonists will no longer be persecuted!

Here's a picture of me slaying make-believe dragons.

And remember kids: A Fool says in his heart, there is no Dragon. I am a fool!

12:59 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home