Tuesday morning, I woke up and headed straight for the Alamo South just in time to catch my first shorts program: "Reel Shorts 3."
For A Swim With the Fish is a charming nine minute tale of a young girl who skips school one day to visit her mother, who she strongly believes is a mermaid living in the Gulf of Mexico.
If you've ever known one of those extreme sports guys who just won't quit, check out
Monday Night. For five minutes--the duration of the film--I just couldn't stop laughing.
I really enjoyed
Tom's War on Terror. The two minute short is predictable, but tackles an all-too-familiar subject in a way that's both laughable and makes you feel weird for laughing at the same time. I'd really like to see some more of Tom's adventures!
Pop Foul, probably the most important film of the set, conveys in twenty minutes what many feature length films have failed miserably to communicate over and over again. The struggle to rise out of poverty and crime is certainly not as easy as so many like to pretend it is; and this film shows a family who's really trying, but may fail due to the negative environment around them, and the reality that others they encounter will constantly deter them rising above.
Piece By Piece is an informative fifteen minute documentary about speedcubing, featuring an array of amateurs and record holders of the Rubick's Cube sport. You get it all: traditional speedcubing, oversized speedcubing, mini-speedcubing, one-handed speedcubing, and so much more! One trick you don't get to see, but I'm awaiting, is speedcubing three traditional cubes while juggling. Accomplish that--and solve the puzzle--and I'll give you a cookie!
By Modern Measure is a smart quip about the "MySpace" generation and its obliviousness to important current sociopolitical events.
We're Going to the Zoo is a sweet fourteen minute short about a brother and a sister who pick up an innocuous hitchhiker on their way to the zoo.
After the "Reel Shorts 3" program, David and I decided to hit Whole Foods for a quick lunch, and saw this awesome South Texas Pride car along the way!

For more information on these films, look them up! I can't be bothered!
***
The most important aspect about
The Devil Came on Horseback is its images, simply for the unfortunate fact that no one, really, has seen anything properly documenting the brutality going on over there. There's been sporadic text every now and then, and even a picture or two; but, by and large, the waves in the press about Darfur are merely ankle busters compared to this film's tsunami of pictorials and video, displaying the absolute horror of that region of Sudan.
The film follows Brian Steidle, a man who's entire career has been military-based. He served as a USMC captain and when he would no longer see combat, he left the military and accepted a contract position in Sudan with the Joint Military Commission, where he would be an integral part of the North-South ceasefire, rising the ranks from a team leader to senior operations officer. After seven months, he was invited to Darfur, where he would serve as an unarmed military observer and American representative for the African Union in that region. This film documents his findings as an observer.
What he found was systematic ethnic-cleansing genocide. The Sudanese government was not only enabling the mass extinction of its citizens, it was controlling it. The "devil" in the title of the film are the
Janjaweed, nomadic black-Arab militia groups who massacre entire villages, by exterminating its non-Arab black African inhabitants and literally burn the tribes' homes to the ground. They are "paid" in plunder and are notorious for raping their female victims, castrating their male victims and torturing them all.
The
Janjaweed have been more adequately equipped and become a far greater threat since non-Arab groups, the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement, have risen up against the Sudanese government, for its mistreatment of its people. Although the government of Sudan has repeatedly denied any assistance to these barbarous raiding bandits, this film has been a breakthrough of evidence, showing quite clearly the government's involvement.
To really understand this film, however, is to understand its tragedy. No one is
really doing anything about this. Even after Steidle came back and lobbied before congress in an effort to call the United States to action, his plethora of images and video were dismissed as nothing more than inconvenient casualties in another state-sponsored genocide that we're unwilling to involve ourselves in. Sure, they were acknowledged and Colin Powell called it what it was--a "genocide"--but there's still over 450,000 dead and counting, and 2.5 million displaced.
This cartoon by Mike Luckovich really says it all:

I could describe to you the images I saw--the maiming and killing of men, women and children; their eyes gouged out and their bodies burned, castrated and mutilated--and how I reacted, emotionally with tears of hopelessness and regret, when I saw this film. But instead, I think it far more powerful for you to go see this film for yourself. Then perhaps you'll want to take action and help let our government know that you want it to take active involvement in stopping this nightmare. It's not enough to talk about it and acknowledge that it's happening--we need to take active measures in preventing the perpetuation of these government sanctioned massacres.
Remember, just as you've read this review in the comfort of your own home or office or wherever, the killing in Sudan continues. And it won't stop until every last one of the non-Arab black Africans are dead,
or when, and if, someone steps in and takes appropriate action to stop it.
For more information on this film, go to:
http://www.thedevilcameonhorseback.com/home.html
To find out more about the conflict and what you can do, go to:
http://www.savedarfur.org/***
One of the really sad things about Hollywood, is that it continues to label Michael Moore a documentarian. His films aren't documentaries, rather, creatively and cleverly manipulated quasi-truthful narratives, posing as entirely nonfiction. He's a damn good entertainer and something of an activist. He believes in shaking up the government and berating its policies, he makes it his mission to expose large corporations for all sorts of naughty things, and he thrives on his own self-prophesying martyrdom. Because so many of his followers agree with his politics, they ignore the untruths and feel the ends justify the means. Sure, Michael Moore has subjects that really need to be tackled, and he's even got some truth behind what he "documents"; but the sheer fact that he manufactures false premises and then "backs them up" with unsubstantiated facts, to arrive at strawman conclusions, really trumps most of what he does.
Manufacturing Dissent basically takes on Michael Moore in the same manner that he's now notoriously known for. Toronto-based documentary filmmakers and "progressive liberals" Rick Caine and Debbie Melnyk originally set out to film a positive documentary about Moore, his films and his methods, due to his enormous contributions to documentary filmmaking (he really has popularized the genre). As Caine and Melnyk engulfed themselves in research, however, they found what many of us had already known: Michael Moore is an arrogant blowhard who--guess what?--manufactures dissent in order to askew topics in his favor. He's really just a walking "talking point" for left-wing liberals. Not that that's a
bad thing, per se; but when facts are ignored, manipulated or taken out of context, we
should have a problem with it. And, worse, when we decide it's better to be to be "quick and witty, rather than thoughtful," as one person in the film describes Moore, we've not allowed ourselves any chance at really getting to the core of these issues (will
The Daily Show and
The Colbert Report be our downfall?).
The film really gets to the heart of what's at stake by talking about the covenant a documentarian has with its audience to tell the truth--at least to the best of the filmmaker's knowledge. Documentaries really serve as a catalyst to incite interest in a particular non-fictional subject for a barrage of reasons, such as social, political, informative or downright entertaining purposes. If the viewer can't trust the filmmaker, the film loses its credibility.
Some might argue that this is a small price to pay for enlightening so many about what's really going on in the world. But take a look at what happens when Michael Moore starts blabbering on about something-or-other. Namely, his sheep-like supporters look at the world in his patented tunnel-vision sunglasses; while his opposers attack him personally and mock all that he stands for. He's a hero for his choir and a demon for his opposition. Isn't that really backwards progress?
For the same reason I don't subscribe to
Star magazine, or watch the E! channel, I try, really hard, not to listen to Michael Moore. And when I do watch his docu...er,
mockumentaries--and I
do watch them--I take them entirely with a grain of salt.
Manufacturing Dissent, on the other hand, seems to be quite in-line with what a documentary film
should be.
For more information on this film, go to:
http://www.myspace.com/161093092***
Zoo is probably as tasteful a movie as can be, given its
bestial subject. For those of you who aren't aware, there's a small population of the world who prefer the love of an animal--both mentally and physically--over the love of a human. This film stylistically recreates the life and death of one horse lover, Mr. Hands, and his pack of animal molesting friends, during one of many meetings and BBQ's in a small town near Seattle. Mr. Hands died from internal injuries, caused by the numerous and repetitive thrusting of the enlarged member of a stallion into his anus.
The film is tasteful because it's not sleazy. In this respect, it's almost
worse on the audience because it
humanizes these so-called animal lovers. What you'd think would be more like a shockumentary, more than anything else, really becomes a shallow dissection of a zoophile's playful mind. It's certainly not psychological, nor really in-depth; but its shallowness really makes it that much more grim.
As I watched the film, I felt like a voyeur peering into the lives of ordinary human beings doing absolutely bizarre and reprehensible things--and they just talked about it as if it were as benign and workaday as eating a bowl of cereal or taking the dog for a ride [insert pun here]. Yet, much like a pedophile talking about his love for children, these zoophile's innocently and sincerely spoke about their love for animals.
Initially concerned about the content of the film, I left the theater without witnessing the exploitation or mockery of bestiality, nor did I see anything graphic or overtly sexual. I did leave the theater a little sickened, however, because I didn't loathe Mr. Hands or his friends. In fact, I somehow sympathized with their pitiful plight.
I could not find an offiicial site for this film.
***Immediately after
Zoo I headed over to Maggie Mae's for the SXSW Film Closing Party where I met and talked for several hours with a new special effects friend of mine and Austin local. Oddly enough, for an hour or two, Nicky Katt (
Boiler Room) was a few feet away, chugging Lonestar, smoking Pot, and chatting it up with Louis Black (editor,
Austin Chronicle). I asked a girl who was with him for a light, but didn't see any need to bother Nicky, himself. I did really like him in
Boiler Room though.
After I'd closed down the party, I was walking to my truck, when I happened to somehow find myself in the
Dirty Country afterparty. Unfortunately, I missed the film, but I got a taste of the music. If you want totally uncouth and raunchy and crude country music, check out Larry Pierce and band.
I don't really remember leaving the party, or what happened between there and my cousin's house. Uhhh... But I did wake up in the morning to see a nifty film about Cancer...
Labels: Festivals / Screenings, film, Movie Reviews, SXSW.07